From: Bernd Weiss <bernd.weiss_at_uni-koeln.de>

Date: Wed 03 Aug 2005 - 15:52:40 EST

R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list

https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Wed Aug 03 15:56:51 2005

Date: Wed 03 Aug 2005 - 15:52:40 EST

Dear all,

The data can be found at <http://www.uni-koeln.de/~ahf34/xerop.dta>.

The relevant Stata output can be found at <http://www.unikoeln. de/~ahf34/stataoutput.txt>. First, you will find the unconditional model, i.e. no level1- or 2-predictor variables. The second model contains some level 1-predictor variables

My R file can be found at <http://www.uni-koeln.de/~ahf34/xerop.R>.

Beside the fact that there is a difference between the estimates of the intercept (unconditional model: R: -2.76459 and Stata: -2.698923) I am especially interested in the level 2 variance.

In Stata the level 2 variance is about 1.03, while in R it is 4.68.

Using glmmPQL from package MASS again gives different results for the level 2 variance component. What is meant by "Residual"? I thought the level 1 variance is fixed to (pi^2)/3.

I am a beginner in multilevel modeling so I assume I made some mistake either in interpreting the output or specifying the models.

I would appreciate any help.

Bernd

R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list

https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Wed Aug 03 15:56:51 2005

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Fri 03 Mar 2006 - 03:39:39 EST
*