From: Rolf Turner <rolf_at_math.unb.ca>

Date: Thu 22 Sep 2005 - 21:40:33 EST

R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list

https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Thu Sep 22 21:51:28 2005

Date: Thu 22 Sep 2005 - 21:40:33 EST

It was gently pointed out to me by Ted Harding that my question was a
load of dingos' kidneys. What happened was that I left out a crucial
factor of 1/k.

Here's the question again, stated correctly this time. (I think!!!)

===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===

Please reply to me directly (rolf@math.unb.ca) rather than to the list, since the question is completely R-free and I'm simply asking this list because there are so many clever and knowledgeable people on it.

Suppose that n_i, i = 1, 2, 3, ... are positive integers, and that

1 k lim --- SUM n_i^j = nu_j < infinity k --> infinity k i=1

for j = 1, 2, 3. Need it be the case that

1 k-1 lim --- SUM n_i * n_{i+1} exists? k --> infinity k i=1

I can neither prove this, nor come up with a counter-example. Can anyone help me out?

cheers,

Rolf Turner

R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list

https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Thu Sep 22 21:51:28 2005

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Sun 23 Oct 2005 - 17:38:25 EST
*