From: Jonathan Dushoff <dushoff_at_eno.princeton.edu>

Date: Sun 25 Sep 2005 - 04:11:42 EST

R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list

https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Sun Sep 25 06:27:58 2005

Date: Sun 25 Sep 2005 - 04:11:42 EST

On 9/20/05, Felipe <felipe@unileon.es> wrote:

> My question was just theoric. I was wondering if someone who were using

*> SAS and R could give me their opinion on the topic. I was trying to use
**> least-squares means for comparison in R, but then I found some
**> indications against them, and I wanted to know if they had good basis
**> (as I told earlier, they were not much detailed).
*

You may find this page helpful: http://www.tufts.edu/~gdallal/LHSP.HTM. The author claims that "least-squares means" is just a weird SAS word for adjusted means, and discusses several advantages and disadvantages.

JD

R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list

https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Sun Sep 25 06:27:58 2005

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Fri 03 Mar 2006 - 03:40:26 EST
*