Re: [R] SVM question

From: Liaw, Andy <andy_liaw_at_merck.com>
Date: Thu 02 Feb 2006 - 00:05:05 EST


Have you tried the range of parameters suggested in

  http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf

?

Please do read the posting guide to help you phrase the question better. Without showing us exactly what you did, we have no way of telling what might have gone wrong. The only information you gave us is that you tried SVM on your data and it didn't do so well. What is anyone supposed to do with that info?

Andy

From: Georges Orlowski  

>
> Well, I know there must be something wrong with the way I'm
> running the
> SVM but I tried all the posiible ranges of parameters gamma
> and cost and
> it does not improve? Could You suggest anything?
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
> > Georges Orlowski wrote:
> >
> > > I'm running SVM from e1071 package on a data with ~150
> columns (variables)
> > > and 50000 lines of data (it takes a bit of time) for
> radial kernel for
> > > different gamma and cost values.
> > >
> > > I get a very large models with at least
> > > 30000 vectors and the prediction I get is not the best
> one. What does it
> > > mean and what could I do to ameliorate my model ?
> >
> > Do you mean 30000 *support vectors* in 50000 observations?
> So you are
> > heavily overfitting. Try to tune the svm better.>
> > Uwe Ligges
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Jerzy Orlowski
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________
> > > R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> > > PLEASE do read the posting guide!
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> >
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide!
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>
>



R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Thu Feb 02 00:16:38 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu 02 Feb 2006 - 02:15:39 EST