Re: [R] lattice: calling functions
On 2/14/2006 9:38 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On 2/14/06, Duncan Murdoch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On 2/14/2006 8:56 AM, Wolfram Fischer wrote:
>> > I defined three functions:
>> >> fun0 <- function( x=1:5, y=1:5, ... ) xyplot( y ~ x, ... )
>> >> fun1 <- function( x=1:5, y=1:5, ... ) fun2( y ~ x, ... )
>> >> fun2 <- function( ... ) xyplot( ... )
>> > The call of fun0() works as expected.
>> > The call of fun1() causes the following error:
>> > 'Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "y" not found'
>> > How should I define fun2 to avoid the error?
>> fun2 is fine, it's fun1 that has problems. It is passing a formula
>> through fun2 to xyplot without telling xyplot where to evaluate the
>> arguments. If you change it to
>> fun1 <- function( x=1:5, y=1:5, ... ) fun2( y ~ x, data=enviroment(), ... )
>> it will tell xyplot to look in the current environment at the time of
>> the call, i.e. the fun1 evaluation environment where x and y live.
> Although this does seem to be how xyplot works, I think it indicates
> there is a problem with it.
> The help file for xyplot indicates that for the xyplot formula method
> the default
> environment is the caller environment whereas it ought to be the environment
> of the formula:
> data: For the 'formula' method, a data frame containing values for
> any variables in the formula, as well as 'groups' and
> 'subset' if applicable. By default the environment where the
> function was called from is used.
> For example, if we replace xyplot with lm it does work as expected:
> fun1 <- function( x=1:5, y=1:5, ... ) fun2( y ~ x, ... )
> fun2 <- function( ... ) lm( ... )
You're right, I forgot formulas have associated environments. I've
added the lattice maintainer to the cc list.
Remail@example.com mailing list
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
Received on Wed Feb 15 02:07:45 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8
: Fri 03 Mar 2006 - 03:42:29 EST