Re: [R] R-OT list needed?

From: Liaw, Andy <andy_liaw_at_merck.com>
Date: Sat 20 May 2006 - 00:32:56 EST


> From: Dirk Eddelbuettel
>
> On 19 May 2006 at 14:20, (Ted Harding) wrote:
> | than you, what that seems to spell out -- maybe "R-Social"
> | might be better).

A ROT-SIG list?  

> Perfect! Those with bruises from asking silly or uninformed
> questions on r-help can refer to that list as ... R-AntiSocial.
>
> Just kidding. I'd be up for an off-topic list with a more
> discerning look at publically fudged and quoted numbers.
> Carl Bialik does something related in his "Numbers Guy"
> column at the on-line Wall Street Journal, but that requires
> a subscription.

For more such statistics (and if you've got 24 minutes to spare), see http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-869183917758574879.

Andy  

> Dirk
>
> --
> Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
> -- Thomas A. Edison
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide!
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>
>



R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Sat May 20 00:37:00 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Sun 21 May 2006 - 00:10:13 EST.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.