Re: [R] lmer, p-values and all that

From: Doran, Harold <>
Date: Sat 20 May 2006 - 22:47:52 EST

here here. I had the wonderful benefit of sitting in a coffee shop in San Francisco with Doug listening to an excellent explanation. I only wish we could replicate that as an FAQ!

Thanks for this, Doug.

-----Original Message-----

From: on behalf of Marc Schwartz
Sent:	Fri 5/19/2006 7:54 PM
To:	Frank E Harrell Jr
Cc:	Douglas Bates; r-help
Subject:	Re: [R] lmer, p-values and all that

On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 17:44 -0500, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
> Douglas Bates wrote:
> > Users are often surprised and alarmed that the summary of a linear
> . . . .
> Doug,
> I have been needing this kind of explanation. That is very helpful.
> Thank you. I do a lot with penalized MLEs for ordinary regression and
> logistic models and know that getting sensible P-values is not
> straightforward even in that far simpler situation.
> Frank

I would like to echo Frank's comments and say "Thanks" to Doug for taking the time to provide this post.

I would also like to suggest that this issue has indeed become a FAQ and would like to recommend that an addition to the main R FAQ be made (wording TBD) but along the lines of:

  Why are p values not displayed when using lmer()?

The response could be:

  Doug Bates has kindly provided an extensive response in a post to the   r-help list, which can be reviewed at:

This might save Doug, Harold and Spencer (I am probably missing some others here) keystrokes in the future... :-)

Best regards,

Marc Schwartz mailing list PLEASE do read the posting guide!

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]] mailing list PLEASE do read the posting guide! Received on Sat May 20 22:54:17 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Sun 21 May 2006 - 00:10:15 EST.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.