[R] Nested design and GLM: ....continue

From: Giovanni Bacaro <bacaro_at_unisi.it>
Date: Fri 26 May 2006 - 06:33:33 EST


Dear list members,
First of all thank you for your helpful advices. After your answeres to my firt mail I studied a lot (R-News n░5) and I tried to perform my analysis:

First, to fit a GLM with a nested design I decided to use the function "lmer" in package "lme4"
as suggested by Spencer Graves and Filippo Piro. I remember you that my data were:

land use classes, 3 levels (fixed factor) = cla (R variable) plot number, 98 levels each with 4 replicates (random factor within "cla") = plotti (R variable)

number of species, totally 392 counts, response variable = sp (R variable)

Now, I startd my analysis as follow (after the creation of the data.frame "bacaro"):

mod1<-lmer(sp~cla+(1|cla:plotti), data=bacaro, family=poisson(link=log))

> summary(mod1) #sunto del modello

Generalized linear mixed model fit using PQL Formula: sp ~ cla + (1 | cla:plotti)

          Data: bacaro
 Family: poisson(log link)

      AIC BIC logLik deviance
 451.2908 467.1759 -221.6454 443.2908

Random effects:
 Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.  cla:plotti (Intercept) 0.60496 0.77779 number of obs: 392, groups: cla:plotti, 98

Estimated scale (compare to 1) 0.6709309

Fixed effects:

            Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)

(Intercept)  2.06406    0.14606 14.1316 < 2.2e-16 ***
cla2        -0.59173    0.17695 -3.3440 0.0008257 ***
cla3        -0.74230    0.83244 -0.8917 0.3725454
---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

Correlation of Fixed Effects:
     (Intr) cla2
cla2 -0.825
cla3 -0.175  0.145



> anova(mod1,test="Chsqr")
Analysis of Variance Table Df Sum Sq Mean Sq cla 2 11.352 5.676 Now, my questions are: 1) is the mod1 well specified? Have I said to R that "plotti" is my random factor and that "plotti" is nested inside "cla" ("cla" as grouping factor)? (can be "lmer(sp~cla+(plotti|cla:plotti), data=bacaro, family=poisson(link=log)" an alternative solution?) 2) Why if I try "lmer(sp~cla+(1|cla:plotti),..." or "lmer(sp~cla+(1|plotti:cla),...." I obtain the same results? 3) why the anova summary don't say if differences in classes are significance (or not significance)? Thank you a lot for your help! Giovanni
>I'd like to perform a glm analysis with a hierarchically nested design.
In particular,
>I have one fixed factor ("Land Use Classes") with three levels and a
random factor ("quadrat") nested within Land Use Classes with different levels per classes (class artificial = 1 quadrat; class crops = 67 quadrats; and class seminatural = 30 quadrats).
>I have four replicates per each quadrats (response variable = species
richness per plot)
>Here some question about:
>1) could I analize these data using the class "artificial" (i.e. I have
only 1 level)?
>2) using R I'd like perfor a glm analysis considering my response
variable (count of species) with a Poisson distribution. How can I develop my model considering the nested nature of my design? I'm sorry but I don't know the right package to use.
>3) for the Anova analysis I'd like use a post-hoc comparison between
pairwise classes. What is the right procedure to do this? Is this analysis performed in R? -- Dr. Giovanni Bacaro UniversitÓ degli Studi di Siena Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali "G. Sarfatti" Via P.A. Mattioli 4 53100 Siena tel. 0577 235408 email: bacaro@unisi.it ______________________________________________ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
Received on Fri May 26 06:42:46 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Fri 26 May 2006 - 08:10:27 EST.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.