Re: [R] PowerPoint - eps not suitable

From: Gabor Grothendieck <>
Date: Sat 24 Jun 2006 - 04:15:18 EST

I think I was just comparing the ones that were discussed but certainly the vector format used on Windows is normally emf or wmf and that is what I would normally use too.

On 6/23/06, Michael H. Prager <> wrote:
> Previous posters have argued for EPS files as a desirable transfer
> format for quality reasons. This is of course true when the output is
> through a Postscript device.
> However, the original poster is making presentations with PowerPoint.
> Those essentially are projected from the screen -- and screens of
> Windows PCs are NOT Postscript devices. The version of PowerPoint I
> have will display a bitmapped, low-resolution preview when EPS is
> imported, and that is what will be projected. It is passable, but much
> better can be done!
> In this application, I have had best results using cut and paste or the
> Windows metafile format, both of which (as others have said) give
> scalable vector graphics. When quirks of Windows metafile arise (as
> they can do, especially when fonts differ between PCs), I have had good
> results with PNG for line art and JPG for other art.
> Mike

> --
> Michael Prager, Ph.D.
> Southeast Fisheries Science Center
> NOAA Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research
> Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
> ** Opinions expressed are personal, not official. No
> ** official endorsement of any product is made or implied.

> ______________________________________________
> mailing list
> PLEASE do read the posting guide!
> mailing list PLEASE do read the posting guide! Received on Sat Jun 24 04:20:36 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Sat 24 Jun 2006 - 06:12:36 EST.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.