# Re: [R] workaround for numeric problems

From: Dimitrios Rizopoulos <Dimitris.Rizopoulos_at_med.kuleuven.be>
Date: Sun 02 Jul 2006 - 20:59:10 EST

I'd compute this in the log-scale (taking also advantage of the 'log' and 'log.p' arguments of dnorm() and pnorm(), respectively), and then transform back, e.g.,

fn1 <- function(B){

-(pnorm(B) * dnorm(B) * B + dnorm(B)^2)/pnorm(B)^2 }

fn2 <- function(B){

p1 <- dnorm(B, log = TRUE) + log(-B) - pnorm(B, log.p = TRUE)     p2 <- 2 * (dnorm(B, log = TRUE) - pnorm(B, log.p = TRUE))     exp(p1) - exp(p2)
}

fn1(c(-15, -25, -35, -55, -105))
fn2(c(-15, -25, -35, -55, -105))

I hope it helps.

Best,
Dimitris

Dimitris Rizopoulos
Ph.D. Student
Biostatistical Centre
School of Public Health
Catholic University of Leuven

```Tel: +32/(0)16/336899
Fax: +32/(0)16/337015
Web: http://med.kuleuven.be/biostat/
http://www.student.kuleuven.be/~m0390867/dimitris.htm

```

Quoting Ott Toomet <otoomet@ut.ee>:

> Dear R-people,
>
> I have to compute
>
> C - -(pnorm(B)*dnorm(B)*B + dnorm(B)^2)/pnorm(B)^2
>
> This expression seems to be converging to -1 if B approaches to -Inf
> (although I am unable to prove it). R has no problems until B
> equals
> around -28 or less, where both numerator and denominator go to 0 and
> you get NaN. A simple workaround I did was
>
> C <- ifelse(B > -25,
> -(pnorm(B)*dnorm(B)*B + dnorm(B)^2)/pnorm(B)^2,
> -1)
>
> It works well for me (32bit intel/linux platform). But what about
> other processors/platforms/compilator options? Are there any better
> ways for finding out at which values the numerical problems start?
> Can one derive something from .Machine\$double.eps (but what about
> the
> precison of dnorm and other analytic functions)?
>
> Ott
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help