Re: [R] Editors which have strong/solid support for SWeave?

From: A.J. Rossini <blindglobe_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu 06 Jul 2006 - 00:05:20 EST

On 7/5/06, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte <rdiaz@cnio.es> wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 July 2006 10:14, A.J. Rossini wrote:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > I have a few colleagues who like the idea of Sweave, but have failed
> > to become enlightened monks of the One True Editor
> > (http://www.dina.dk/~abraham/religion/)
> >
> > Are there any other Microsoft-centric editors or IDEs which have solid
> > support for writing SWeave documents (dual R / LaTeX enhancements
> > similar to ESS's support)? Has anyone tried the folding editors which
> > support Noweb?
>
>
> Dear Tony,
>
>
> I often use Leo (http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html) which is
> like a literate editor on steroids (folding + outlining, noweb and cweb
> support, and a _lot_ more), and I use it for all complex/long Rnw documents,
> including interacting with R ...
>
> ...but I "cheat", because the editing itself (of the "nodes" or folds),
> including submitting code to R from the R chunks, I do in emacs (with ESS).
>
> Leo is available for Linux, Win, Mac and is written in Python.
>

I've used Leo a few years ago, and liked it (but not enough to convert). I'll have to try it again. Thanks!

best,
-tony

blindglobe@gmail.com
Muttenz, Switzerland.
"Commit early,commit often, and commit in a repository from which we can easily roll-back your mistakes" (AJR, 4Jan05).



R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html Received on Thu Jul 06 01:28:36 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Thu 06 Jul 2006 - 04:17:27 EST.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.