Re: [R] PCA with not non-negative definite covariance

From: Berton Gunter <gunter.berton_at_gene.com>
Date: Thu 27 Jul 2006 - 02:09:31 EST


Not sure what "completely analagous" means; mds is nonlinear, PCA is linear.

In any case, the bottom line is that if you have high dimensional data with "many" missing values, you cannot know what the multivariate distribution looks like -- and you need a **lot** of data with many variables to usefully characterize it anyway. So you must either make some assumptions about what the distribution could be (including imputation methodology) or use any of the many exploratory techniques available to learn what you can. Thermodynamics holds -- you can't get something for nothing (you can't fool Mother Nature).

"The business of the statistician is to catalyze the scientific learning process." - George E. P. Box    

> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-bounces@stat.math.ethz.ch
> [mailto:r-help-bounces@stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Quin Wills
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:44 AM
> To: bady@univ-lyon1.fr
> Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [R] PCA with not non-negative definite covariance
>
> Thanks.
>
> I suppose that another option could be just to use classical
> multi-dimensional scaling. By my understanding this is (if based on
> Euclidian measure) completely analogous to PCA, and because it's based
> explicitly on distances, I could easily exclude the variables
> with NA's on a
> pairwise basis when calculating the distances.
>
> Quin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bady@univ-lyon1.fr [mailto:bady@univ-lyon1.fr]
> Sent: 25 July 2006 09:24 AM
> To: Quin Wills
> Cc: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [R] PCA with not non-negative definite covariance
>
> Hi , hi all,
>
> > Am I correct to understand from the previous discussions on
> this topic (a
> > few years back) that if I have a matrix with missing values
> my PCA options
> > seem dismal if:
> > (1) I don’t want to impute the missing values.
> > (2) I don’t want to completely remove cases with missing values.
> > (3) I do cov() with use=”pairwise.complete.obs”, as
> this produces
> > negative eigenvalues (which it has in my case!).
>
> (4) Maybe you can use the Non-linear Iterative Partial Least Squares
> (NIPALS)
> algorithm (intensively used in chemometry). S. Dray proposes
> a version of
> this
> procedure at http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/R/additifs.html.
>
>
> Hope this help :)
>
>
> Pierre
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Ce message a été envoyé depuis le webmail IMP (Internet
> Messaging Program)
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>



R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. Received on Thu Jul 27 02:12:43 2006

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.8, at Thu 27 Jul 2006 - 10:18:00 EST.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.