Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 10:21:43 -0600 (MDT) From: Jim Robison-Cox <jimrc@mathfs.math.montana.edu> To: r-help <r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch> Subject: Significance stars (was Re: R-beta: glm bug) In-Reply-To: <9806181220.AA19064@alpha.luc.ac.be> On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Jim Lindsey wrote: (snip) > I might also say that I strongly object to the stars and significance > levels in summary (sorry, Martin, we already discussed this). I > consider fixed level testing to be bad statistics; at worst, a P-value > should be given if nothing better (confidence or credibility > intervals) is available. I do not want my students seeing such stars > and fixed levels. Make it an option if you like but not the default > display with summary(). > Jim I agree! Is there a good way to set an option which goes to a print method (in this case print.summary.lm)? Would it have to be a global option? Jim Robison-Cox ____________ Department of Math Sciences | | phone: (406)994-5340 2-214 Wilson Hall \ BZN, MT | FAX: (406)994-1789 Montana State University | *_______| Bozeman, MT 59717 \_| e-mail: jimrc@math.montana.edu -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request@stat.math.ethz.ch _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._