Re: [Rd] Minor issue building 2.3.0 under Red Hat Linux 9

From: Marc Schwartz <>
Date: Thu 27 Apr 2006 - 12:54:13 GMT

On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 10:53 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Dominick Samperi wrote:
> > Building R 2.3.0 fails under Red Hat 9.0 because
> > ssize_t is not defined in src/modules/internet/sock.h.
> > Inserting #include <sys/types.h> at the top of this
> > file fixes the problem.
> That's interesting: POSIX says it must be defined in unistd.h, and that is
> included before sock.h in all the C files AFAICS (and this is why all the
> Unix-alike platforms tested before release do compile that module).
> It's a bug in RH9 (there seems to be no 9.0), and that is maintained by
> Fedora Legacy -- do they have an update?

Prior to RH 9 (ie. RH 8.0), there were fractional releases with updates. However, with 9, while updates were provided, the numbering scheme changed to integer releases only and this is still the case with FC.

Fedora Legacy's raison d'etre is to provide security updates but not necessarily functional updates and/or general bug fixes. This seems to be the case for RH 9 if one reviews the list of updates that they have provided to date:

There is no guarantee from the FL folks as to how long they will support older releases beyond the roughly 1.5 years post EOL for a prior version of RH/FC. This is articulated in their "1-2-3 and out" policy and we are well beyond the 1.5 years for RH 9.

Seeing Peter's response on SuSE 8.0, one of the things that might be in common here is the use of the 2.4 series kernels. Was there a change of some sort with the 2.6 kernels that would impact this situation?

HTH, Marc Schwartz mailing list Received on Fri Apr 28 00:06:18 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu 27 Apr 2006 - 22:17:58 GMT