Re: [Rd] package check note: no visible global function definition (in functions using Tcl/Tk)

From: Thomas Petzoldt <>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:23:34 +0200

Dear Prof.Ripley, Dear Seth,

thank you both, including tcltk in Depends as suggested by Prof. Ripley immediately helped to silence the tcltk NOTEs, but Seth is also right. It is in fact not the ultimate solution for the Suggests case, that I intentionally used like in Seth's code example.


Seth Falcon wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley <> writes:

>> It seems that is happens if package tcltk is missing from the Depends: 
>> list in the DESCRIPTION file.  I just tested with Amelia and homals and 
>> that solved the various warnings in both cases.

> Adding tcltk to Depends may not always be the desried solution. If
> tcltk is already in Suggests, for example, and the intention is to
> optionally provide GUI features, then the code may be correct as-is.
> That is, codetools will issue the NOTEs if you have a function that
> looks like:
> f <- function() {
> if (require("tckltk")) {
> someTckltkFunctionHere()
> } else
> otherwiseFunction()
> }
> }
> There are a number of packages in the BioC repository that provide
> such optional features (not just for tcltk) and it would be nice to
> have a way of declaring the use such that the NOTE is silenced.
> [Note 1: I don't have any ideas at the moment for how this could
> work.]
> [Note 2: Despite the false-positives, I've already caught a handful of
> bugs by reading over these NOTEs and think they provide a lot of value
> to the check process]

> + seth
> mailing list Received on Mon 11 Jun 2007 - 20:25:47 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Tue 12 Jun 2007 - 08:34:35 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.