Re: [R] significant variables in GPLS ?

From: Bjørn-Helge Mevik <b.h.mevik_at_usit.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:25:05 +0200

There is little theory about significance and testing for PLSR (and, I would guess, GPLSR). Many practicioners use Jackknife variance estimates as a basis for significance tests. Note, however, that these variance estimates are known to be biased (in general), and their distribution is (to my knowledge) not known. Any significance deduced from them should therefore be regarede as merely indicators.

-- 
Bjørn-Helge Mevik

______________________________________________
R-help_at_r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Received on Thu 24 Apr 2008 - 10:26:17 GMT

Archive maintained by Robert King, hosted by the discipline of statistics at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0, at Thu 24 Apr 2008 - 10:30:30 GMT.

Mailing list information is available at https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help. Please read the posting guide before posting to the list.

list of date sections of archive